ANALYST TASK 7
ANALYST: SILVIA
Chat GPT Plus
Hello! I’m here to help you reflect deeply and meaningfully on your work. My role is to guide you in uncovering hidden assumptions, spotting potential blind spots, and strengthening your ability to show that your work is truly your own. I won’t complete the task for you, but I will help you think critically about what you’ve learned, how you approached it, and where it connects to other knowledge.
Before we start, could you please share the task instructions or assignment description with me?
Once I have that, I’ll craft five personalized reflection questions tailored to your task. These will help you evaluate:
If you’ve completed the task correctly,
What you’ve learned,
Any new skills or knowledge you’ve developed,
How you can prove the work is genuinely yours,
And how this learning connects with other things you know.
I'm ready when you are! Just paste the task details below.
Tú dijiste:
Out task was about evaluating the technological tools we have used in this subject (ICT). For this, we had to evaluate in a rubric 3 elements we were forced to use (Aula Virtual, mBlock with codey rockeys and Blogger) , 3 elements we already knew (Canva, Instagram and Chat Gpt) and 3 elements that we discovered (Free Form, Object Viewer app and Questionpro). In this rubric, we had to evaluate the app based on the Functionality, Accessibility, Technical, Mobile Design, Privacy, Data Protections and Rights, Social Presence, Teaching Presence and Cognitive Presence. After having done that, we had to fill a form adding all of that information from the rubrics and saying which part was harder to grade.
ChatGPT Plus
That sounds like a thoughtful and detailed evaluation of technological tools! Now that I understand your task, here are five personalized reflection questions to help you think more deeply about what you’ve learned and how you approached the task:
Reflection Questions
1️⃣ Did you apply consistent criteria when evaluating all the tools, or did personal experience or familiarity influence some of your ratings? How did you ensure fairness in your assessments?
2️⃣ Which category in the rubric was the hardest to evaluate, and why? Did certain tools lack transparency in areas like privacy, accessibility, or social presence?
3️⃣ What surprised you the most while evaluating the tools? Did you discover that a tool you thought was great had significant flaws, or did you find unexpected strengths in a tool you had never used before?
4️⃣ How can you demonstrate that this work is genuinely your own? Could you explain your thought process, mention specific examples, or describe how your ratings evolved as you worked through the rubric?
5️⃣ How does this evaluation connect to what you already knew about technology? Has it changed the way you approach choosing digital tools for learning or working in the future?
Now, take a look at these questions. Do any of them seem particularly complex or worth exploring further? Let me know the number of the question you'd like to dive deeper into! 😊
Tú dijiste:
About question 3, what surprised us the most was discovering that most of the apps we would usually use for all of our projects, weren't quite well adapted for a mobile design. For example, with free form is quite hard to do. Also, we underestimate a lot of apps and overrate ones that have a lot of things to improve like Canva.
ChatGPT Plus
Thank you for your thoughtful reflection on question 3! It's interesting how your assumptions were challenged during this task — discovering that some of your go-to apps like Canva had hidden flaws, while new tools weren’t as user-friendly on mobile as expected. That realization is a powerful moment of growth!
Let’s dive deeper to uncover more layers of this reflection. Here are some additional sub-questions that might help you explore why these surprises happened and what you can learn from them:
3a. Why do you think tools like Canva gained your trust initially, and what specific aspects did the rubric expose as weak or problematic?
(Consider whether familiarity, popularity, or aesthetic appeal influenced your early opinion.)
3b. What did this experience teach you about the importance of testing tools across different devices, especially mobile?
(How might this shape the way you evaluate or recommend tools in the future?)
3c. Were there any new tools, like Free Form or QuestionPro, that surprised you by offering features or functionalities you hadn’t expected?
(What assumptions did you have about these "new discoveries" that were either confirmed or proven wrong?)
3d. How would you handle this task differently next time to avoid underestimating or overrating tools based on first impressions?
(For example, would you try setting specific tests or scenarios?)
3e. Can you describe a moment where your opinion changed during the evaluation? What caused that shift?
(This helps document your personal learning journey — a good way to prove the work is your own.)
Would you like to pick one of these sub-questions to explore next?
Or, would you like help connecting this reflection to how you approach other types of evaluations or decision-making tasks in school or life?
Remember, if at any point you’d like examples, academic sources, or real case studies about evaluating technology tools — just ask!
Tú dijiste:
About question 3e, our opinion really changed when it came to the use of those tools in mobile phones and also with privacy and data protection. These 2 categories are the ones that vary the most, while it is true that many apps allow us to protect our data from unwelcome host, we discovered that there were some that didn´t really do it. Also, the accessibility part was really unexpected. We had never really thought about many aspects related to accessibility until the rubrics and it really opened our minds.
ChatGPT Plus
This is a fantastic reflection — you're uncovering layers that many users often take for granted! Realizing how mobile compatibility, privacy, data protection, and accessibility differ between tools shows critical awareness that goes beyond surface-level use. This kind of insight is exactly what strengthens your ability to prove the work is genuinely yours — because you’re sharing the personal reasoning and surprises you encountered.
Since you're finding this topic rich, here are new follow-up questions (numbered as 3e1, 3e2, etc.) to help you push your reflection even deeper — feel free to pick one to explore next:
3e1. How did your understanding of “accessibility” evolve while doing this task?
Did you identify specific barriers in the tools that made you think differently about what accessibility really means (beyond just being able to open the app)?
3e2. How might learning about privacy and data protection through this task influence how you use apps like Instagram, Canva, or even ChatGPT in the future?
Would you change any habits or settings based on what you discovered?
3e3. Can you give an example of an app you assumed was strong in privacy or accessibility but turned out weaker than expected — and explain how that realization happened?
(This is a great way to show your process and self-awareness for proving the work is your own.)
3e4. Do you think most people around you — classmates, teachers, family — understand the same things about accessibility and data privacy?
Why might this knowledge gap exist, and how would you explain what you’ve learned to someone else?
Would you like to select one of these for deeper exploration? Or is there another direction you're curious to explore now? 😊
Also, your connection between accessibility and privacy surprises is really interesting — have you noticed how both topics aren’t always visible until we’re asked to evaluate them? This opens up a great conversation about what gets overlooked in digital tools.
Tú dijiste:
To answer 3e2, we definitely think that we will be more precocious with apps like Instagrams when it comes to accepting cookies or allowing something that we did not even read before. We will be checking everything twice and also, it might help us with reducing our consume since now we trust less those apps.
ChatGPT Plus
Wow — what a powerful and honest reflection on 3e2! 🌟 Realizing that you now trust those apps less and will change how you interact with things like cookies, permissions, and consumption habits shows a real shift in digital awareness — exactly the kind of growth this task was designed to inspire.
This shows me that you’re not just checking a box in your assignment — you’re thinking critically about how technology shapes your behavior and your relationship with digital tools.
Would you like to deepen this even further? Here are a few optional follow-up questions you might find interesting:
3e2a. How do you think app designers make it easy for us to “skip” privacy settings or accept cookies without thinking?
What strategies do these platforms use to make us trust them — and how might being aware of this change your approach?
3e2b. Have you considered that your reduced trust in apps like Instagram could also change the kind of content you engage with or produce?
Would this reflection impact what you post, how often, or what you share?
3e2c. Can you imagine designing a rubric in the future specifically focused on privacy, cookies, and data tracking?
What new criteria would you add after what you’ve learned from this task?
Would you like to explore one of these, or is there another question or reflection you’d like to revisit?
Also — you’re naturally connecting privacy concerns with user behavior and trust, which is a huge insight. Have you noticed that this connects back to Question 5 — How this evaluation connects to what you already knew or to other areas of knowledge?
I can help you explore that next if you’d like! 😊
Tú dijiste:
Now I'm going to answer question 2 from the beginning. The hardest category to evaluate was probably Technical and also the Social Presence. When it comes to the Technical category, it was quite specific and we had to think harder and more detailed than in most of the other categories. There were also some technical words that we had to investigate like HTML code. Speaking of the Social Presence category, it is kind of related to the first one, we had to really take into account many detailed aspects and it could become quite confusing.
ChatGPT Plus
This is a great reflection on Question 2, and I love that you pointed out two key challenges: technical complexity and the abstract nature of social presence. Both of these often trip people up because they require going beyond just personal experience — you had to research, analyze deeply, and interpret concepts you weren’t initially comfortable with. That’s where real learning happens.
The fact that you had to look up terms like HTML also shows you were actively building knowledge rather than passively guessing — an excellent way to prove the work is yours.
Let’s break this open a little further with follow-up questions (numbered 2a, 2b, etc.) that might help you explore why these categories were tough and what skills you built along the way:
2a. What specific technical aspects or terms (like HTML) did you research, and how did understanding them change the way you evaluated the apps?
(This is a great place to explain your process — showing that you didn’t just “fill in” the rubric, but actually learned something new.)
2b. Why do you think “Social Presence” was confusing? What parts of that category felt hardest to define or measure, and how did you ultimately decide on your ratings?
(Could reflecting on this help clarify what “social presence” really means in tech tools?)
2c. After facing these difficulties, what strategies would you use next time to handle confusing or highly technical evaluation tasks more confidently?
(For example: defining terms first, looking for examples, or discussing with classmates.)
2d. Can you describe a moment where you realized you had misunderstood part of the technical or social presence criteria and had to correct yourself?
(If yes, sharing this would show reflection on your learning process and make it super clear the work is your own.)
Would you like to pick one of these to explore next?
Or, do you want to connect these struggles to new skills or knowledge you developed — linking it to Question 3 or 5 about learning and future applications?
You're doing great — and your mention of the connection between Technical and Social Presence is insightful. Both require thinking about how things work behind the scenes — did you notice that similarity?
Tú dijiste:
Lastly, I am going to answer question 3e2b from before. Yes, we totally believe that it has changed the content we engage with. For example, if we are watching a video that it will possibly lead us to some unwanted or explicit content, then we might just skip it and watch another thing. We are definitely more aware now of the fact that everything we see one day on these apps might be appearing everyday for the rest of the month, so we have to be cautious and really careful with what we like.
Comments
Post a Comment